“What is the
difference between a Democrat and a socialist?” MSNBC host Chris Matthews asked
Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D., Fla.).
“Uh,”
Wasserman-Schultz responded.
“I used to think
there was a big difference,” Matthews said. “What do you think?”
“The difference
between—the real question is what’s the difference between being a Democrat and
being a Republican,” Wasserman-Schultz said, attempting to dodge the question. Matthews didn’t let her off easily.
“Yeah but what’s
the big difference between being a Democrat and being a socialist?” Matthews
said. “You’re the chairwoman of the Democratic Party. Tell me the difference
between you and a socialist.”
“The relevant debate that we’ll be
having over the course of this campaign is what’s the difference between being
a Democrat and being a Republican,” Wasserman-Schultz repeated.
Source: http://www.wsj.com/
This is a simple question and should produce a simple
answer. Socialists (those who embrace the
economic scheme of socialism) opt for government ownership and/or control of
the economy’s productive and distributive activities. Debbie doesn’t know this? And she needs to answer this question – are
you a capitalist (private ownership of an economy’s productive and distributive
activities) or are you a socialist as is the main challenger to Hillary Clinton. Bernie Sanders would not (should not at
least) struggle with the question as he is a self defined socialist.
There was one other defining moment, recently and it
involved Hillary. She was asked – “describe
yourself in three words.” You may have
seen it. What did she come up with after
her silly laughter and obvious inability to know what best to say?
“I am a real person.”
Ask almost any person to define themselves in three words
and this is roughly what you will get –
A woman will say, Wife, Daughter, Mom, Sister, Grandma,
Granddaughter, Aunt, Good Friend and maybe, a reference to a vocation or an
avocation.
A man will most likely say, Husband, Son, Dad, Brother,
Grandpa, Grandson, Uncle and possibly something dopey like “struggling golfer” or
“crazy inventor” or some such thing.
But – “real person.”
There is something very, very strange about this woman. Is she just acting (programmed to pretend to be real, perhaps?) when on
the stage or campaigning or politicking?
There is nothing real about her answer.
Something is very wrong here.
The head of the party can’t say if she or the party is
socialist or not while the party’s leading candidate wants us to know that she
is a real person. Yee gods, folks, these
two women are nuts.
BTW, we can easily come up with three words to describe Bubba's frau (or the other goofy gal) but we are committed to a policy of respectful and appropriate commentary.