That is the question; the focus of our essay today.
Usually we elect these fellows who are just normal
narcissists. You know, every day, run of
the mill, it’s-all-about-me guys who are so taken with themselves that they are
in heaven with all the clamoring and the entourages and the cameras and the “Mr.
President, this…” and “Mr. President, that…”
Bill Clinton is an insufferable narcissist but even Bill found his way
to a common sense proposal once in a while.
George W. was a mess – actually a bit of a dope and too easily managed
by the narcissists he surrounded himself with – but to his credit – he has
disappeared from the scene. Yes, he did
leave a bit of a mess for us.
But this time we rang the bell – grabbed the brass ring –
found the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. We got ourselves a beauty – a full blown,
prancing around, no connection between what he/she does/says one day and says
or does the next day. Just create
drama. Always a drama – a crisis – a show
– never solve anything – but you can bet that the drama of today will come back
again in three or four months and in between there will be five or six new ones.
Just imagine if we had an honest press – honest, truthful
commentators to expose this queen of ours?
Or, to put it another way, just imagine if our queen were a
republican? It’s funny to even consider
it.
So, how do we deal with four more years of Obama drama?
Well, we investigated what others have discovered about
drama queens and this is what we found:
Scientific American did an article on drama queens – go to: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=dangerous-liaisons
According to Scientific American dealing with a drama queen can
lead to anxiety and depression. Okay, we
didn’t really need them to point that out – we’re there. Been there for some time. They also tell us that all this drama could
stem from either childhood trauma or genes, meaning its inherited. Okay, we can buy into that also – one does
need to spend hours at www.ancestry.com to
figure out that Obama had some ups and downs as a kid. But how does that help us get through January
2017?
Well, we may in trouble.
Apparently – the drama does not lessen; queens don’t have built in
corrective capability which, we think, means they are unlikely to stop with the
drama; even with professional guidance. Here
is what SA tells us to do:
- Set boundaries – Sorry, Barry, we cannot cover your crisis today
- Be consistent. For John Boehner we think this means no more silly negotiations with the queen because the queen is not going to be consistent
- Stay calm. For fiscal conservatives, this is the challenge
- Create a paper trail – in other words document the nonsense and hope facts will prevail. Unfortunately, TheFundamentals has spent 4+ years doing that and it is not working
- Cut ties with the queen – if only it were that easy
230 years ago, the founding group got rid of their king. First did the paper trail (Declaration of Independence)
then cut the ties. 230 years later, we voluntarily
crowned ourselves a queen. That was no inauguration
last month. That was a coronation. It will be an anxious and depressing four
years. Let’s hope we can survive her.
1 comment:
The problem is not drama. Rather it is the uncomfortable reality that the government really does create jobs. Along with the reality that actions have consequences. Given the perilous state of the economy, the idea of raising taxes or cutting spending at this time is sheer foolishness. While that idea may make the Fundamentals squirm a bit, it does not change the fact that the UK, Italy, Ireland and Greece are faring far worse than the Us, because they have cut their budgets in the misguided idea that it would boost their fortunes.
Post a Comment