Adjective -
|
||
|
·
Kids can stay on their parents health insurance
longer
·
Preexisting conditions cannot be a basis for insurance
denial
The affordable care act is so difficult to understand, much
less implement, because it obviously contains provisions that make no sense. On the very surface of the wording of the
legislation there are obvious, contradictory problems. No, the implementation is not being postponed
because American business needs time to get its act together. That argument is not just facile, it is dead
wrong. The government cannot get its act
together and that is actually the good news.
Even the government is reluctant to enact something that is downright
unworkable – in theory now that the theory is understood – and most certainly
will be every bit the train wreck as one of its principal Democrat supporters
recently defined it. If you doubt this
assessment ask your physician about Obamacare.
You will get an earful. What happens
when the train wreck becomes apparent? More
facile answers, we would surmise which forces us to look into the future a bit.
Obama now says he was out front on the NSA spying
situation. Huh? Some poor kid is now a guest of the Russians because
he got out front on the NSA spying situation.
In any other time or place the Democrats would be pulling for the
kid. But the facile president has
kowtowed to the bureaucrats and why not – what are a few freedoms if it means
he does not need to answer any questions about an event on his watch?
About the last thing anyone ever wishes to find in a purported
leader is this “facile” characteristic. Yet, we see that Mr. Obama has turned over
his propagandist - David Axelrod to Mrs.
Clinton for the sole purpose of propping her up with this very same trait. When she dismissed questions about an event on
her watch with the insult – what difference does it make? – she actually faced
a critical decision. Do I accept
responsibility because I am responsible, ultimately for whatever happens on my
watch or do I skip out – provide a simplistic dodge and dismiss the topic so
that all who follow me, support me, who I want to vote for me can follow my
simple response.
She chose – a facile response. This is a character issue. We believe it to be a disqualifying issue. Perhaps not for a congress person or a senator,
even a mayor or governor. But when our
country faces a massive debt which is clearly our most critical long term
problem/issue – be it national security or just financial responsibility, a woman who follows the lead of a facile man
is not capable of leading a country back to a solid foundation.
In her most recent speech, she chose the facile issue of voting
rights – an issue without any substance.
This simply means she chose to rile up her black voters so that they
will not ignore the midterm elections and not turn their back on her in three
years. She chose a facile situation
instead of a leadership situation – debt, deficits and the unworkability of a
massive federal government.
She chose badly – again and she will do it again and again. Today
she is a facile candidate. She is a well
trained, facile candidate.
No comments:
Post a Comment