A constitutional crisis is a
situation that the legal system's constitution other basic principles of
operation appear unable to resolve; it often results in a breakdown in the
orderly operation of government. Often, generally speaking, a constitutional
crisis is a situation in which separate factions within a government disagree
about the extent to which each of these factions hold sovereignty. Most
commonly, constitutional crises involve some degree of conflict between
different branches of government (e.g., executive, legislature, and/or judiciary),
or between different levels of government in a federal system (e.g., state and
federal governments).
Source: Wikipedia
So, yes, America could be looking at a cc, as defined above.
Where does one usually find a cc? Is such a situation unique to America? Well, in answering these questions
TheFundamentals is about to introduce a component of the cc definition not
found above. The component is power. The
simple exercise of power regardless of the existence of a written constitution.
Who has the power? Who
exercises the power? What is the history
of the “orderly operation of government?”
Examples please.
Chicago. Could Chicago
have a cc? Not a chance. Power in Chicago is not defined nor is the
orderly operation of government separated – to an executive or a legislative
body or the courts. It is centralized –
in one man – in one party – in one cabal.
Ergo, no cc’s in Chicago.
One more example please.
Okay, Illinois. Could Illinois have
a cc? Not a chance. Power is not defined nor is the orderly
operation of government separated – to an executive or a legislative body or
the courts. It is centralized – in one
man – in one party – in one cabal. Ergo,
no cc’s in Illinois.
Well, we think we are getting it. Just one more please. Okay, how about Russia? Could Russia have a cc? You guessed it – not a chance. Power is not defined nor is the orderly
operation of government separated – to an executive or a legislative body or
the courts. It is centralized – in one
man – in one party – in one cabal. Ergo,
no cc’s in Russia.
So why are we having, or at least facing, the possibility of
a cc here at home, in our beloved Washington DC? Doesn’t the president and his party control
most everything? Aren’t they used to
getting their way? Little or no opposition?
Sure they are but it is possible that we are about to see,
to experience, to witness, a cc, if this simple statement in our (America’s) basic
law – the constitution (c) – has any meaning in the face of a dominant group
lead by one man which has no experience with separation of power and checks and
balances doctrines. Read this please:
Article I. Section 9
- US constitution
“No
Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations
made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and
Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.”
Article I and its many
sections define the powers of the congress – the senate and the house of
representatives.
You see, this place, America, is about laws, not men, not
cabals, not one political party, not one man.
For almost five years now, the propaganda machine of one man and his
cabal – his political party, have ruled without any concern about the law
because those who could have opposed him/them did not. And now, they appear, or at least a few of
them appear to have decided to perform according to the law and not do what the
one man and his cabal – his political party want to do.
The one man and his cabal have little or no experience with
this situation. Mr. Obama came out of a one man/one cabal/one political
party situation that always got its way – no compromise needed – just do it our
way – always our way. Wasn’t Russia, but
a place very similar to Russia in its system of governance. No opposition party to deal with – so one
man, one system, one cabal gets its way – in everything. That is Chicago and the state of Illinois.
Those places are bankrupt – morally and financially
bankrupt. In Washington DC a few of the
opposition fellows decided to stop the country (America’s) path to the same
destiny. Well at least for this moment
it appears such. You see, we are very suspicious of the other fellows (the
minority opposition cabal) because they are leaderless and very, very weak,
self focused men, also.
We can only hope we are about to have a full blown, true in
every sense of the word – constitutional crisis. Even if you don’t like the players and regardless
of your view(s) or which side you may align with – it is in all of our best
interest that this turns out to be a doozy of a cc. We doubt that it will but it could be a sign
of things to come. We are a much divided
nation. Divided nations don’t settle
their differences readily.
1 comment:
Gone are the days when we were a nation of laws, not men.Since the electorate majority became those getting free stuff, lawmakers can do anything with impunity, so long as the free stuff keeps coming. All this posturing by obnoxious Obama and even more obnoxious Ted Cruz is to either solidify power or grab onto to it. When the collapse comes,as surely it must,the last sentence of this essay will have proven to be prophetic.
Post a Comment