The key phrase in the previous paragraph is “off fighting
the 3rd crusade…”
Why? The last time
Christianity in the form of the kings, queens and popes of Europe decided they had
had enough of the prophet’s pilgrims plundering and pillaging of the Holy land and all in between the Holy
land and their neighborhoods was over 1000 years ago. Here is a rough timeline and description of
the several crusades and their objectives/results:
1st – (1096 – 1099) the beginning crusade was
announced by Pope Urban II in response to an appeal from the Byzantine
Emperor to get rid of the Sunni Muslims who controlled much of Turkey as well
as to recapture the Holy Lands (HL) and control Jerusalem. They had some successes but their
accomplishments were not long lived leading to..
2nd – (1145 – 1149) started by Pope Eugene III
and led by kings of France and Germany.
They were unsuccessful in the HL but did kick the Moors out of Lisbon,
leading to the…
3rd – as noted Richard led it with some
assistance from Holy Roman Emperor Barbarossa and Austria’s Leopold against the
Muslim leader Saladin. They had some success
but failed to retake Jerusalem which led to….
4th – (1202 – 1204) did not get much done other
than to finalize the break between Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox
Christians
5th thru 9th – (1217 – 1272) not good
results for the Christians setting the stage for the current situation or if
one is secure in their acceptance of the prophet – Allahu Akbar
There are many good books and endless history telling
available at your library or on the World Wide Web (unless you live in most of
the Muslim lands) to help you grasp the history of this centuries old conflict. Suffice it to say – it’s been a long, long
war.
So, what is the point of this extraordinarily abbreviated
summation of the crusades? Two
things. Call it what you will –
crusades, war on terror, democratization, bringing justice, women’s rights,
etc. – the western powers have no lasting track record of success in defeating
the prophets horde much less converting them or modernizing them. And, any such attempts to do so will occupy
more centuries – not years or decades as promised and will bankrupt even the
most financially secure of the defenders of freedom and our way of life, etc. In other words,
OBLaden knew exactly of what he spoke when he said all his gang needed to do
was rile up the infidels and let them go about destroying themselves.
Which leads us to this conclusion:
- Contain them in their oil rich lands, if possible, and
- Examine their toe/foot/leg holds in our own neighborhoods
Contain means – ally with those Islamists who will place
their self preservation ahead of the new caliphate (or at least stop destroying them as we have been doing) and any or all of those non Islamists
bordering the Muslim lands who are not seeking conversion but are facing it due
to geographical proximity (BTW - that's a strategy.)
Examine our own policies regarding their entry into our
lands. This, of course, is highly
politically incorrect which speaks volumes about our inherent weakness –
the idea that we can ignore an intolerant societal/cultural/commercial and political
movement and call it a “religion” is just plain nuts. They tell us to convert or die – we might
wish to consider if that “religious belief” is a bit inconsistent with our
open, independent, free society or what remains of it today. The US constitution, what little is left of
it that is, prohibits any form of established religion or any impediments to
anyone’s religion. Don’t need to be an east coast lawyer to figure out that a religion that does not
tolerate other religions is a no-no.
Do you ever get the idea that we go out of our way to make everything as complicated as possible and that in so doing all we are really doing is dancing to the tune of someone who benefits from the complexity?
1 comment:
Today's essay seems written to make the point that fighting the Muslim horde is everlasting and, therefore, futile.
What it omits is a bit longer history of Christian-Muslim enmity. In 732 A.D. Charles Martel defeated the Moors at the battle of Tours. In doing so the European continent was spared the domination of Islam. All of Iberia, including Portugal and Spain were under Islamic domination at this time, and Martel drove them back to Iberia The point is, Muslim aggression was the reason for the Crusades, as Europeans had enough experience with Islamic fundamentalists hundreds of years before the Crusades started.
Eventually, The Moors were driven entirely out of Europe, including Spain in the 1490's. In fact, Spain was so grateful to God for having expelled Islam that Queen Isabella, in giving thanks, hocked her royal jewelry to finance a seagoing mission to find a circular route to the Far East to improve trade for Spain along with the clear understanding that the Word of Christ would be brought to the peoples of China. The captain of that voyage was Christopher Columbus.
Post a Comment