It is an essay about security interests and democracy and
the growing contradiction between stated US of A principles and legal positions
versus those of the Jewish State of Israel (JSI). And, the influence of JSI interests in
directing US foreign policy. And the
implications of those policies looking forward.
TheFundamentals encourages an information gathering project
by watching a video entitled, “The Gatekeepers,” and reading a new book
entitled, “Goliath, Life and Loathing in Greater Israel.” Here are references to these sources:
http://www.amazon.com/Goliath-Life-Loathing-Greater-Israel/dp/1568586345 Also available at your public library.
http://www.amazon.com/Gatekeepers-Yuval-Diskin/dp/B00DHNB8EO/ref=sr_1_1?s=movies-tv&ie=UTF8&qid=1394971326&sr=1-1&keywords=the+gatekeepers Also showing on Amazon Video.
Today, we get a bit more specific. And, a forewarning, what follows is a
politically incorrect discussion meaning it does not abide by the JSI talking
points which guide AIPAC and the adherence of American media management and
money interests closely tying the US of A with the long term defense and all
around support of JSI.
Is Israel (JSI) an open democracy? Can a Christian go there and be treated
equally as a Jew? What about an
Arab? Or a Muslim? Could an Arab be elected prime minister? A Christian?
The answer is no. JSI
is founded and governed as a Jewish state.
Just as Pakistan and Iran and Saudi Arabia are Islamic states. They are not democracies, in any meaningful sense
of the word. They exist to provide a
closed political environment for those who adhere to a common set of beliefs or
values or history or all of the above.
Or, at least, try to or claim to.
They do not believe that all are created equal – not when it
comes to political power. Which is a
very convenient way or saying – we may tolerate you in our country under
certain limited circumstances but do not attempt to proselytize your views or
seek political power. You will be
stopped.
Now, should that be a concern in American foreign policy
which theoretically advances both our national security interests as well as
our political belief in democratic rule?
By concern we mean, can we openly support with money, arms, and other
forms of economic, military and commercial activities non democratic states?
Our answer is thus – the reason America finds itself
wandering from pillar to post among many focused and parochial interests today,
in a totally reactive mode, around the world, is our illogical separation from
a few very profound founding principles of this country:
·
All people are created equal
·
No state religions can be imposed on the people
·
People have the right to determine their
government
Now we are not so naïve as to think some limited
involvements and accommodations will be made along the way. But America’s embrace of JSI in every
possible manner is a direct and very visible violation of our both our founding
and evolved principles. The same
statement is true of most every other aspect of America’s internally imposed decline
– we have moved too far from our principles:
·
Limited government
·
Individual responsibility
·
Limited foreign entanglements
Here too, there will always be a need for some involvements
and accommodations. The true security
interests of America are now at risk – not because of external events. Simply because we have lost our belief and
adherence to the very principles on which we came to be.
Europe needs to make its own accommodations with Russia –
but both have much larger demographic and security issues with their Islamic neighbors
and residents. In case you have forgotten,
Japan needs to make accommodations with China – the Chinese have not forgotten. Israel is now so far from an accommodation
with those who surround it that all that remains is hope. The Chinese are moving into Africa and into
the western hemisphere. They dominate Asia
economically and militarily – it does not take much to anticipate that Africa
and Central/South America are next.
American security interests are no longer based in Europe, Russia and
the Middle East – they are right here in our backyard and we had better get about
making them our number one priority.
John Kerry’s unfortunate remarks about Barack’s disinterest in
the Monroe Doctrine will haunt America for many, many years to come.
American foreign policy under both Bushes, both Clintons and
the Obama/Kerry team has neither advanced our national security interests nor
our democratic beliefs. Our focus needs
to be here at home, implementing the above principles and then in our hemisphere
– not scattered inconsistently around the globe in wars we never win and
alliances we cannot maintain.
Chances of common sense prevailing? Inversely related to the size of the bureaucracies that set all the bad policy discussed above.
Chances of common sense prevailing? Inversely related to the size of the bureaucracies that set all the bad policy discussed above.
No comments:
Post a Comment