California
Wiretapping Law
"California's
wiretapping law is a "two-party
consent" law. California makes it a crime to record or
eavesdrop on any confidential communication, including a private conversation
or telephone call, without the consent of all parties to the
conversation.
See Cal. Penal Code § 632. The statute
applies to "confidential communications" -- i.e., conversations in
which one of the parties has an objectively reasonable expectation that no one
is listening in or overhearing the conversation. See Flanagan v.
Flanagan, 41 P.3d 575, 576-77, 578-82 (Cal. 2002). A California
appellate court has ruled that this statute applies to the use of hidden video
cameras to record conversations as well. See California v. Gibbons, 215 Cal.
App. 3d 1204 (Cal Ct. App. 1989).
If
you are recording someone without their knowledge in a public or semi-public
place like a street or restaurant, the person whom you're recording may or may
not have "an objectively reasonable expectation that no one is listening
in or overhearing the conversation," and the reasonableness of the expectation
would depend on the particular factual circumstances. Therefore, you
cannot necessarily assume that you are in the clear simply because you are in a
public place.
If
you are operating in California, you should always get the consent of all
parties before recording any conversation that common sense tells you might be
"private" or "confidential." In addition to subjecting you
to criminal prosecution, violating the California wiretapping law can expose
you to a civil lawsuit for damages
by an injured party. See Cal. Penal Code § 637.2."
1 comment:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated...
It's called the 4th amendment and supposedly protects personal privacy, not only from the government, but from the thought police as well.
So, a private conversation is secretly tape recorded and look what happens!! What next?
Post a Comment