A couple of specifics –
·
Anyone who thinks the long run game of having a
complacent and compliant press in your corner – a press that refuses to
challenge power – to question policy and actions – in other words to do its
job; is a good thing just got a firsthand lesson of why Obama and his minions
would have been much better served with a real press challenging him over the
last four years instead of America’s slobbering Hollywood media.
·
The five son’s remark is classic – because it
illustrates in living color that Romney the man is a fellow who does not get
sucked into easy come solutions sold by pandering politicians to entitled and
expecting voters. He neither offers
those solutions nor buys into them when confronted with them.
·
Telling the entitled moderator who has fed at
the public trough for decades that his subsidy is about to end is the best
recent example of vertebrae strength and testicular weight that we have
observed in a long, long time.
·
$90 billion of Obama subsidies for green energy
against the $2.8 billion for oil companies that Obama keeps whining about. We enjoyed this one for a very particular
reason – Obama had the audacity (think Nixon claiming he was not a crook) to
say anyone who knows him knows he is not a whiner – well, hello, we have a
whiner in chief at 1600 Pennsylvania avenue.
·
And our last observation – these pages owe their
beginning to the promiscuity of one of America’s bad presidents – George W. Bush
and his four congresses. Why? Our founding principle: deficits = debt = destruction. Mr. Romney put it right on the line; early in
the debate. He called the debt “IMMORAL.” He said it is immoral to place debt on our
children and our grandchildren. He said
it is immoral to expect them to pay the interest charges and repay the
debt. MR. ROMNEY IS RIGHT. MR. OBAMA IS WRONG.
Why did we call this brief post – trickle down
government? Well, we can’t take credit
for it. Kim Strassel at the Wall Street
Journal made the observation that whoever thought up that slogan should get a
raise. We agree. The imagery is classic.
No comments:
Post a Comment