Warren said something like this – you don’t know who is
swimming without a bathing suit until the water recedes. Now we think what Warren had in mind was that
those who are exposed usually aren’t exposed until something changes or goes
bad.
Mr. Debt and his chief propagandist, David Axelrod, missed
this message – they didn’t miss Warren’s message about raising taxes on the
well to do and spending gobs of money on Warren’s businesses, however. Selective message acceptance may well turn
out to be Mr. Debt’s undoing but we think there will be such a long list of
suspects for his undoing that prioritizing the causes as he begins term two is
a waste of time.
Back to this bathing suit metaphor and its applicability to Mr.
Debt’s government. Obama’s federal government
is swimming without a bathing suit on and has been for some time. This risqué behavior – let’s just call it
“skinny dipping” for the remainder of this lecture, is not a democrat problem –
it is a bipartisan problem. Federal
government skinny dipping has been building for a long time and, over this long
time, the water may have gone out a bit, but never quite far enough to expose
that area north of the knees and south of the navel. Until a few years ago. Then some of the swimmers panicked when the
water receded a bit – they blew the whistle out of fear. And forced everyone out of the water. Those millions of well padded government
employees who had been out there naked were suddenly exposed. We could all see that they were not properly
dressed – we really mean trained, managed, disciplined, effective, and
productive. They were inept.
You see, when the water is high and all are covered, no one
knows about the bathing suit issue – or, to speak more plainly, when times are
good a non functioning government is of little concern because everyone focuses
on the positive. When times are bad, the
non functioning government suddenly becomes very visible to all – that area
north of the knees and south of the navel is exposed for all to see. And it is not a pretty sight.
We have previously observed that short of an alchemists
dream solution – turning water into oil or platinum trillion dollar coins, our
skinny dipping government is going to continue to have its privates on display
until one of two things happen – financial disaster and shutdown, or, financial
shutdown and disaster. There is a third
possibility but it would involve wearing a bathing suit – getting rid of all
the bad and wasteful government spending schemes. We know one thing for sure – bathing suits
are not in vogue for the next four years.
2 comments:
While the economy in the United States has not returned to pre-2008 levels, the austerity policies that the Fundamentals seems to espouse appear to be shown by empirical evidence to be a worse choice. Recently, there has been talk of a potential lost decade in the UK. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/jan/26/goldman-sachs-criticism-george-osborne-austerity
One can find similar articles with regard to Greece, Spain, Italy, etc.
Is there an alternative to the current policies, perhaps there is. Is cutting spending at this time one of them? The evidence is in and cutting spending at this time has been shown to be a poor idea. Actually, there does not appear to be any logic in raising taxes either, but the politic winds favored it, so it happened.
There is a debt problem in the medium to long term. There is a growth problem now. Let's deal with now before we start dealing with the future.
Today, television is the mainstream medium, which influences substantially the public opinion and, what is more, it has the power to influence the formation of an individual’s identity.
Post a Comment