$15.75 MILLION SETTLEMENT TO FELD ENTERTAINMENT ENDING
14 YEARS OF LITIGATION
Unprecedented
Settlement Brings Total Paid to Parent Company of
Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey® Circus to More Than $25 Million
Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey® Circus to More Than $25 Million
Groups
Settle with Circus After Federal Court Determined Case
Was "Groundless and Unreasonable"
Was "Groundless and Unreasonable"
VIENNA, Va. - May 15, 2014 - The Humane Society of the United
States (HSUS), along with their co-defendants, have paid Feld Entertainment,
Inc., the parent company of Ringling
Bros. and Barnum & Bailey® Circus, $15.75
million to settle cases stemming from a lawsuit they brought against Ringling Bros.® over
the care of its Asian elephants. This historic settlement payment to Feld
Entertainment ends nearly 14 years of litigation between the parties.
"We hope this settlement payment, and the various court
decisions that found against these animal rights activists and their attorneys,
will deter individuals and organizations from bringing frivolous litigation
like this in the future," said Kenneth Feld, Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of Feld Entertainment.
In December 2012, the American Society for the Prevention of
Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA), a former co-defendant in the case, settled its
share of the lawsuits by paying Feld Entertainment $9.3 million. Today's
settlement brings the total recovered by Feld Entertainment to more than $25
million in legal fees and expenses, which the company actually spent in
defending the Endangered Species Act case.”
The concept of loser pays, in litigation, is universally
accepted – everywhere but in the United States.
It is only when a defendant is willing to enter into lengthy, costly
litigation and then prove the frivolous and/or fraudulent nature of the charges
that an American court will force the accuser to pay the defendants costs. Such was the case with the charges levied
against Feld Entertainment of Ringling Bros circus fame.
In one of our first essays, in September 2009 (go to: http://thefundamentalsus.blogspot.com/2009/09/tort-reform-loser-pays.html
), TheFundamentals encouraged America to join virtually every other developed
nation on the face of the earth in applying the legal concept of “loser pays”
to all litigation. Why? It is the very concept that disciplines most
every other interaction between individuals, groups and organizations
today. One must take responsibility for
their actions and not just seek to use government and litigation to self
enrich. Most litigants avoid going to
court – they settle – to avoid the uncertainty and costs of a jury or judge verdict. Regardless of blame or culpability, they
settle to get out from under the burden of time consuming and possibly very
expensive legal costs.
Who benefits from this system? Cui bono?
Only one group of people – lawyers and more specifically,
trial lawyers. They love the
system. It is estimated that this corrupt
system, benefiting only this selfish group of trial lawyers added $210 billion
to American business costs in 2008 according to this source (see: http://www.metrocorpcounsel.com/articles/9493/fortune-500-total-cost-litigation-estimated-one-third-profits
.) That’s about $3,000.00 per family in the US.
America has driven its commerce and business to foreign
shores to avoid unnecessary litigation.
We cannot even begin to measure the accumulated devastation and cost
associated with such foolishness.
Loser pays – simple change – already available everywhere –
only the lawyers lose. And, of course,
the Democrats who depend on the rich campaign contributions which flow solely
to them to keep this corruption in place.
Closing comment – Feld Entertainment had to fight these
frivolous and erroneous claims for 14 years in order to prevail. FOURTEEN YEARS. $25 MILLION IN TOTAL COSTS!!!. Do you think that is a "justice system?" The only two groups in America that don’t see
the injustice in that fact are trial lawyers and Democrats which is about all
you need to know if you have ever asked yourself, “Why is America in decline?”
No comments:
Post a Comment